Recruiting’s Changing, and So Are We

Recruiting isn’t what it used to be.

I know, I know. That’s not breaking news.

But the changes run deeper than what the casual fan might notice. At the FBS level, NIL—name, image, and likeness—has shaken up recruiting. In the NEC, the transfer portal has been the game-changer. Take Cameron Barmore at Mercyhurst, for example. He became a star, hit the portal, and landed at the Power Four level. No surprise to those who saw him play, but for Mercyhurst, losing arguably its best player could seem like a major setback. Or maybe not. Instead, it positions Mercyhurst as a prime example of a "developmental program"—a model that more NEC schools are starting to embrace.

A traditional developmental program looked something like Wake Forest under Dave Clawson in his early years—redshirt freshmen, build them up, and by year five, you’ve got seasoned impact players. That blueprint is fading fast. Now, if you develop a standout player, you’re likely to lose them to the portal. But instead of fighting it, NEC programs can flip the script and turn it into a selling point.

That’s a big shift in mindset. A "developmental program" isn’t just about long-term grooming anymore—it’s about preparing players to move up. Some NEC coaches are even leaning into this in recruiting: "Come here, and we’ll get you ready for the big time." High school players who didn’t get Power Five offers might see an NEC school as a place to refine their skills and earn another shot at the highest level.

At the same time, NEC programs can use the portal to their advantage, bringing in transfers from FBS schools. Guys who struggled for playing time at bigger programs can drop down, make an immediate impact, and boost an NEC team’s chances of winning right away. It’s a two-way street—losing talent but also reloading with portal additions. The example here is Noah Robinson, who came to RMU from Old Dominion and became a star player in Moon Township. The challenge is finding the right balance. If you’re trying to establish yourself as a program that develops freshmen, you can’t lean too heavily on transfers. You want to show recruits that you can develop them into P4-caliber players, not just plug holes with transfers every season.

Historically, I haven’t talked much about transfers leaving the NEC because I wanted to cover the league for its own sake. I’ve always believed the NEC deserves coverage on its own merit, rather than ever referring to it as a stepping stone to somewhere else. But if the recruiting model for coaches is shifting, I guess I need to change how I cover it, too. More players are making the jump to higher levels, and that deserves recognition. The NEC is a great league with great players. That hasn't changed. But moving forward, I’ll be giving a little more shine to the guys who started here and took their talents to the next level.

At the end of the day, recruiting is about adaptation. Programs must decide if they want to be a launchpad for rising talent or a second-chance destination for transfers. The best teams will strike the right balance—developing core players, losing some to bigger schools, but keeping enough to maintain stability while using the portal to plug gaps. It’s no longer just about scouting high school talent; it’s about managing a roster like a general manager at the pro level.